We have heard very little in Nova Scotia in the last two years that hasn’t been underlined with the word “expert”. We have been given endless and often contradictory missives from a series of un-elected unaccountable “experts”. Who are these “experts” and what is the specialized training they possess that gives them absolute and unquestionable power? In one of their newest disturbing moves, they are employing coercive measures mandating the injection of children under 16 years of age with experimental mRNA products of highly questionable effectiveness that pose a clear and well documented immediate danger and completely unknown risk of lifelong damage to the most vulnerable among us.
Despite the fact that the manufacturers of both Moderna and Pfizer, the two experimental mRNA injections currently under emergency authorization use, have the following listed under pediatrics in their product monographs:
PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINECOVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, Suspension for Intramuscular Injection
The safety and efficacy of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in children under 16 years of age have not yet been established.
PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION Moderna COVID-19 mRNA-1273
The safety and efficacy of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine in individuals under 18 years of age has not yet been established.
Despite the WHO statement of “More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19”;
Despite the The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization UK stating: “Today’s advice does not recommend vaccinating under-18s without underlying health conditions at this point in time”;
Despite the massive and growing scientific evidence that these injections pose a real short term and unknown long term danger to children;
Despite the Health Agencies of Sweden , Finland, Iceland and Denmark all completely halting the Vaccinations of those under 18, un-elected civil servants here in NS are eagerly trying to inject children even younger than 12 if they can “make it work”.
What follows is an email exchange taking place 10 days before before the experimental mRNA products were even given “emergency authorization” for this age group.This group spends a lot of time discussing a concept they call “mature minor consent”. This is the incredibly dangerous idea that state agents can and in fact should decide what is best for your child.
To label what you are about to read as disturbing would be a significant understatement:.
Who are the people interested in over overcoming parental concerns and injecting children with experimental mRNA concoctions, and what expertise in Bio science, Immunology or Pediatrics do they bring to the table? The people involved in these discussions are a groupgrab bag of technocrats, propagandists and social justice warriors with little to zero training in hard science.
The below is little missive was sent by Tracy Babrick, a career technocrat who has spent 20 years pocketing Nova Scotia taxpayer money in administrative roles in various government departments. She has worked in Nova Scotia Health since 2011 becoming a deputy minister in 2015. This is in fact one of the 300k a year bureaucrats that has managed the complete disintegration of Nova Scotia’s health system creating a situation where if you phone an ambulance it may not come, if it does come, there may be no open emergency room and if all that miraculously works out you may still sit in the hospital parking lot for up to 45 minutes. This is the technocrat in charge of vaccine rollout in Nova Scotia. Strangely from the very beginning, before they were even authorized to receive it, Tracy was focused on young men:
“Polling shows younger men “are the ones we expect we need to work the hardest to reach,” said Barbrick.”
Terri Cole is another quarter million dollar a year Technocrat who, after earning a Bachelor in Nursing in 1986,. By 1991 Teri started a 13 year stint in 1991 with the Regional Poison Center at IWK. The Center lists their function as;
“The IWK Regional Poison Centre (RPC) strives to ensure that optimal individualized care is provided in the event of a real or potential poisoning. Specialized nurses, pharmacists, and physicians serve the public and health care providers of Nova Scotia and PEI with a 24 hour/seven day a week telephone service that provides access to expert clinical advice aimed at limiting or preventing injury due to drugs or poisons.” Teri should apply that to experimental / emergency-authorised pharma products that show signs of damaging children’s hearts.
Next we have Shelly Deeks. Shelly is a busy lady, holding both the ominous sounding position of “Public Health Surveillance officer of Health for Nova Scotia” while and being a member of a researcher for CIRN or Canadian Immunization Research Network a group “partnered” with Smith Glaxo Kline and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals and that describes its mission as “informing” new speak for lobbying “Canadian Health decision makers.” Their list of publications runs toward defeating “vaccine hesitancy” in pregnant women and children and defeating that ever present straw-man “misinformation”. Seems like a pretty direct conflict of interest does it not. Interesting to note that Shelly “holds Public Health fellowships in both Australia and Canada” So at least we know what may be Shelly has in store for us next as we look to the new Public Health driven utopia emerging Down Under which has just announced that those refusing the mRNA concoction are liable forto up to $5000 in fines and is fast has becoming an Orwellian nightmare state. When she first transfered from Ontario to Nova Scotia a CBC article had her proudly proclaiming how she had been been “very fortunate to have trained under Dr Anthony Fuaci, those articles have since been redacted to omit this quote. Deeks is also a board member of GAVI the Bill Gates funded vaccine lobby group. We will be having a much closer look at Dr Shelly in an upcoming article.
Lastly we have “Wellness Navigator” for Nova Scotia Health Melissa Boland. A “Wellness Navigator” is described by the Nova Scotia Government as performing the following functions:
Providing Wellness based services to the general population and supporting community
“The focus of this programming is to promote community capacity building around navigation skills. The Wellness Navigator is responsible for implementing the development of these programs. These programs can be implemented by partnering with other community members or organizations with expertise in Wellness Navigation.”
community Health Team Wellness Navigation Framework
I will leave you to figure out what any of that could mean in a province where ambulance service and emergency care are almost non-existent. Melissa’s only educational background is in social work in which she has a Masters Degree. Perhaps this will make you feel better about your postponed surgery or your relative who died waiting outside an emergency room.
Ultimately the worth of any society can surely be measured by the protection it affords its children.
It is time to demand our public officials immediately act with transparency. Contact them at every level. Contact the officials of Nova Scotia Health directly and tell them that we and we alone will make decisions for our minor children.
Vaccine risks in children
1). Association of Myocarditis With BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Case Series of Children myocarditis was diagnosed in children after COVID-19 vaccination, most commonly in boys after the second dose. In this case series, in short-term follow-up, patients were mildly affected. The long-term risks associated with postvaccination myocarditis remain unknown. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to inform recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in this population.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2783052?utm_campaign=articlePDF&utm_medium=articlePDFlink&utm_source=articlePDF&utm_content=jamacardio.2021.3471
Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has recently been reported to health authorities in the United States and other countries. Cases predominately occur in young adult males within four days following the second dose of either the Moderna (mRNA-1273) or Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccines.
Myocarditis has been recognized as a rare complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccinations, especially in young adult and adolescent males.
In this study of 7 patients with acute myocarditis, 4 occurred within 5 days of COVID-19 vaccination between February 1 and April 30, 2021. All 4 patients had received the second dose of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, presented with severe chest pain, had biomarker evidence of myocardial injury, were hospitalized, and had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings typical of myocarditis.
Our report of myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination may be possibly considered as an adverse reaction following immunization. We believe our information should be interpreted with caution and further surveillance is warranted.
Young patients presenting with ischaemic stroke after receiving the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine should urgently be evaluated for VITT with laboratory tests
A study by Oxford University found the number of people with bloodclots after getting vaccinated are about the same for those who get #Pfizer PFE, and #Moderna MRNA, #vaccines as they are for the #AstraZeneca
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research future patients , in order to meet the medical ethics standard for informed consent.
“our data reveals that S protein alone can damage endothelium, manifested by impaired mitochondrial function and eNOS activity but increased glycolysis. “
“There is currently limited evidence on the duration of protection and on the efficacy of these vaccines in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, although studies are ongoing…..myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have been reported, most frequently in adolescents and younger adults under 30”
The Convention on the Rights of the Child
Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the
United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable
rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and
peace in the world,
Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in the Charter, reaffirmed
their faith in fundamental human rights and in the dignity and worth of the human
person and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in
Recognizing that the United Nations has, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and in the International Covenants on Human Rights, proclaimed and agreed that
everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction
of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other status,
Recalling that, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations has
proclaimed that childhood is entitled to special care and assistance,Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the natural
environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and particularly children,
should be afforded the necessary protection and assistance so that it can fully assume
its responsibilities within the community,
Recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her
personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness,
love and understanding,
Considering that the child should be fully prepared to live an individual life in society
and brought up in the spirit of the ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United
Nations and in particular in the spirit of peace, dignity, tolerance, freedom, equality and
Bearing in mind that the need to extend particular care to the child has been stated in
the Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child of 1924 and in the Declaration of the
Rights of the Child adopted by the General Assembly on 20 November 1959 and
recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (in particular in articles 23 and 24), in the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (in particular in article
10) and in the statutes and relevant instruments of specialized agencies and
international organizations concerned with the welfare of children, ‘
Bearing in mind that, as indicated in the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, “the
child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and
care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth”