Authors Note; Please follow the links and do your own research, believing random shit on the internet is how we all got here..and here sucks.
The failure of the Queensland University, CSL Covid19 vaccine candidate UQ-CSL V451 offers further proof of the designer origins of the Novel Corona virus. While the Australian vaccine that had exact copies of HIV code in its pre-manufactured Covid19 “Spikes” the mRNA vaccines being produced by Pfizer and others will actually instruct the muscle cells of your own body to produce this HIV-1 code.
On Jan. 31, 2020 Indian researchers at the University of New Delhi and the Kusuma School of biological sciences, Indian institute of technology published a paper after sequencing the Novel Corona Virus then known as 2019-nCoV. What they found startled them. No less than four separate sequences in the “spike proteins” of 2019-nCoV were exact copies of sequences found on the same structures in HIV. These are the proteins on viral surfaces that allow them to penetrate our cells and which vaccines are designed to recognize. This shocked the researchers because as they note in their paper;
“The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.“..Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag Prashant Pradhan$1,2, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi1, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan*1and Bishwajit Kundu, Kusuma School of biological sciences, Indian institute of technology, New Delhi-110016, India. 2Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110019, India
In plain English this is not a natural organism. Now if you have followed my advice on doing your own research you will have ran into dozens of fact checks stating that the paper was “withdrawn” by its authors after being found incorrect. This is not true at all. All of the authors still list it among their published paper list. These are highly qualified people and I can find no fault in their methodology. They were forced to withdraw it by BioRxiv pre-publishing site after being mobbed, no one can question the origin or anything else about SARS-Cov2 without being attacked. The Paper is still live on Research Gate. The withdrawal of the Australian Vaccine is strong evidence they were completely correct. .
Down load the entire paper here;
The recent failure of the Australian UQ-CSL V451 vaccine because it caused false positives for HIV in its recipients is strong verification of the Indian results. As the Australian press states,
“The UQ vaccine candidate used a protein and adjuvant platform, containing the COVID-19 spike protein and a “molecular clamp”. A small component is derived from the human immunodeficiency virus, known as HIV, that is not able to infect people or replicate.
A source with knowledge of the clinical results said although the HIV protein fragment posed “absolutely no health risk to people”, they had identified that some trial participants who received the vaccine produced a partial antibody response to it.“….https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australian-covid-vaccine-terminated-due-to-hiv-false-positives-20201210-p56mju.html
I contacted Bishwajit Kundu one of the studies main authors by email. He and his team were not aware of the Australian Vaccine failure, here was his response
Vaccine derived immunity is driven by the vaccine getting your body to recognize the genetic code in these “spikes” so that your body will recognize the live pathogen. In essence the vaccine UQ-CSL V451 used a manufactured SARS-Cov2 “spike” injected into the subject along with adjuvant technology to boost the human immune response. They would only use HIV code if it were an exact match for the Spike proteins on the SARS-Cov2 organism. Those exact code matches in FOUR different insert points could not occur naturally.
From the Paper
“We found that these 4 insertions [inserts 1, 2, 3 and 4] are unique to 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses analyzed. Another group from China had documented three insertions comparing fewer spike glycoprotein sequences of coronaviruses . Another group from China had documented three insertions comparing fewer spike glycoprotein sequences of coronaviruses (Zhou et al., 2020).…We then analyzed all available full-length sequences (n=28) of 2019-nCoV in GISAID (Elbe & Buckland-Merrett, 2017) as on January 27, 2020 for the presence of these inserts. As most of these sequences are not annotated, we compared the nucleotide sequences of the spike glycoprotein of all available 2019-nCoV sequences using BLASTp. Interestingly, all the 4 insertions were absolutely (100%) conserved in all the available 2019- nCoV sequences analyzed [Fig.S2, Fig.S3]. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a perpetuity.preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 31, 2020; We then translated the aligned genome and found that these inserts are present in all Wuhan 2019-nCoV viruses except the 2019-nCoV virus of Bat as a host [Fig.S4]. Intrigued by the 4 highly conserved inserts unique to 2019-nCoV we wanted to understand their origin. For this purpose, we used the 2019-nCoV local alignment with each insert as query against all virus genomes and considered hits with 100% sequence coverage. Surprisingly, each of the four inserts aligned with short segments of the Human immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) proteins. The amino acid positions of the inserts in 2019-nCoV and the corresponding residues in HIV-1 gp120 and HIV-1 Gag are shown in Table 1. The first 3 inserts (insert 1,2 and 3) aligned to short segments of amino acid residues in HIV-1 gp120. The insert 4 aligned to HIV-1 Gag. The insert 1 (6 amino acid residues) and insert 2 (6 amino acid residues) in the spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV are 100% identical to the residues mapped to HIV-1 gp120“….
This should terrify everyone because the new and untested mRNA vaccines work by inserting messenger mRNA into your own cells. Messenger Ribonucleic Acid programs our cells DNA to produce various things. What these mRNA vaccines will in effect be doing is to program our bodies to produce HIV-1 genetic code in our muscle cells.
“The mRNA vaccine contains instructions for making the distinctive spike protein found on the surface of the coronavirus and which attaches to a particular protein in our body. Once the mRNA is inside your muscle cells, they use them to make the protein and display it on their surface, according to Pfizer. Your immune system spots the protein, recognizes it as foreign and begins to make antibodies.“https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/how-does-the-pfizer-biontech-coronavirus-vaccine-work/2775551/
Further verification of these facts may have recently surfaced as American health authorities investigate severel deaths in the US after receiving the mRNA vaccine seemingly caused by thrombocytopenia as
“Thrombocytopenia is a common complication of HIV infection. The low platelet count can be caused by multiple mechanisms including immune-mediated destruction, decreased platelet production, “
mRNa Vaccines have never been used in widespread human trials and they have many potential dangers
“The fact that an entirely new RNA vaccine technology which has never been used before in humans is a danger signal that should not be ignored. Several of the US candidates (Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, and Arcturus Therapeutics) are using this never-before-approved technology. Exogenous mRNA is inherently immunostimulatory, and this feature of mRNA could be beneficial or detrimental. It may provide adjuvant activity and it may inhibit antigen expression and negatively affect the immune response. The paradoxical effects of innate immune sensing on different formats of mRNA vaccines are incompletely understood. Potential safety concerns include local and systemic inflammation, biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies, and potential toxic effects of non-native nucleotides and delivery system components. A mRNA-based vaccine could also induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity. Another potential safety issue could derive from the extracellular RNA which has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may promote blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.”…ROMEO F. QUIJANO, M.D.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila
“mRNA is the central molecule of all forms of life. It is generally accepted that current life on Earth descended from an RNA world. mRNA, after its first therapeutic description in 1992, has recently come into increased focus as a method to deliver genetic information.”
List of Adverse events in the US as of January 2nd 2021 as per health and Human Services, 127 Deaths and thousands of serious side effects, please search the document
Never forget Public Health and Eugenics have a very close history, and good luck to all.
This chapter details historical points of connection between the field of public health and the eugenics movement in the United States, and explores the ethical significance of public health genetics in light of that history. It explains how attention to both eugenics and public health grew simultaneously in the twentieth-century United States, and how both fields contributed to the growth of laws that emphasized the use of the police power to constrain reproduction and immigration among certain groups as a means to advance efficiency and social progress. The chapter suggests that an emphasis on the prevention of problematic hereditary conditions supplies a similar motive for a new public health genetics today.https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190245191.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190245191-e-56